Software Rescue

Your software works. Mostly. I make it reliable.

I rescue unfinished and broken software projects, whether built by AI, freelancers or previous developers.

Built with Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Cursor, Claude Code or a custom stack? I can help you understand what is broken, preserve what works and move the product forward.

One engineer · Direct communication · No rewrite by default

production.log

Symptoms

Does this sound familiar?

If more than two of these are true, the problem is not one bug. It is the absence of a reliable foundation under a product that already has users waiting.

  • The app works until you change something.
  • AI fixes one bug and creates another.
  • Authentication works only for some users.
  • Payments fail randomly.
  • Roles and permissions are inconsistent.
  • Production deployment is unstable.
  • You do not know whether secrets are exposed.
  • The database has no reliable constraints.
  • There are no useful logs.
  • The previous developer disappeared.
  • You are afraid to invite real users.

Scope

What I fix

The failures that keep a product out of production are usually the same ones, in a different order.

authentication authorization roles and permissions payment flows webhooks API failures database design data integrity deployment environment configuration security secrets management logging monitoring queues background jobs frontend/backend integration production readiness architecture bottlenecks

The promise

A rewrite is not the default answer

I don't automatically propose a rewrite.

Roman Golovanov

I first understand what you already have, preserve what works and fix what actually blocks the product. Starting from zero is easy to sell and expensive to live with: it throws away the working parts you already paid for, and it resets the clock on every user you were about to invite.

Service formats

Four ways to start

Prices are indicative starting points, not quotes. The real number depends on what the diagnostic finds.

Fix a specific problem

A focused issue such as authentication, payment, API, deployment or data inconsistency.

From USD 150

Production readiness review

A structured review before inviting real users or starting paid acquisition.

From USD 250

Ongoing technical support

Continued maintenance and technical ownership after stabilization.

Monthly agreement

Process

How a rescue runs

Nothing is touched before it is understood. You always know what I am doing and why.

  1. Step 01

    Send URL, repository and a short description

    What the product does, what is broken and what you are afraid of. No technical specification required.

  2. Step 02

    Initial fit check

    I tell you whether this is something I can help with. If it isn't, I say so.

  3. Step 03

    Focused diagnostic or paid review

    I read the code, the data model and the deployment, and reproduce the failures instead of guessing at them.

  4. Step 04

    Clear repair plan

    What is broken, what is risky, what is fine, what it costs to fix and what can wait.

  5. Step 05

    Fixes in prioritized order

    Things that lose money or leak data first. Cosmetic issues last.

  6. Step 06

    Regression testing

    A fix that breaks something else is not a fix. Behaviour is verified before anything ships.

  7. Step 07

    Handover and recommendations

    You get a working system, a written account of what was changed and what I would do next.

Checklist

Production readiness checklist

The sixteen things I check before an application is allowed to meet real users. A production readiness review walks through every one of them.

  • secrets
  • auth
  • access control
  • payments
  • webhooks
  • database constraints
  • error handling
  • logging
  • monitoring
  • backups
  • deployment
  • rollback
  • rate limits
  • data deletion
  • privacy
  • dependency risks

FAQ

Questions I get before we start

Only if the existing system is objectively more expensive or dangerous to repair. A rewrite is not the default recommendation.

Yes. The source of the code matters less than whether the product can be understood, tested and made reliable.

Usually yes, but the first conversation can begin with a URL and problem description.

Yes. The process can be organized through written communication, repository access and progress reports.

Send your app URL, repository and a short description of what is broken.

You don't need a diagnosis. That is my job. A few sentences about what fails and when is enough to start, and I'll tell you whether I'm the right person for it.